Pain records · Illinois injury attorneys

Your client lives in Madison County and treats in Missouri. The pain record we build does not care which side of the river the courtroom is on.

We build a pain record from measured findings, not descriptions, and when the diagnosis rests on a facet or sacroiliac joint we confirm it with two concordant controlled diagnostic blocks. Dr. Padda is licensed in Illinois and Missouri, and records are released in full on the client’s signed HIPAA authorization.

For Illinois personal injury and workers’ compensation counsel: how we document, what a controlled diagnostic block proves, and how records cross the state line.

A physician reviewing a folder of medical records at a desk in a clinic office.

What makes a pain record hold up in an injury case?

Most pain records fail under cross-examination for the same reason: they describe. A description of pain is a claimant’s statement passed through a physician’s pen, and opposing counsel knows it. A record that holds is built from things that were measured. The mechanism taken in the client’s words at the first visit and dated. Range of motion in degrees. Strength graded, reflexes graded, sensation mapped. Provocation tests named, with the result. Imaging read against that examination rather than in place of it, because a systematic review of spinal imaging in asymptomatic adults found disc degeneration in most people by their fifties and bulges in a majority, so an MRI report alone establishes very little about causation and even less about the pain generator.

Where the diagnosis rests on a facet joint or a sacroiliac joint, and after a crash or a lifting injury it often does, there is no scan that finds it. The test is a controlled diagnostic block: local anesthetic placed on the nerves that supply the joint, with the client recording pain at intervals afterward. One block is not enough. The false-positive rate of a single uncontrolled lumbar facet block was measured at roughly a third in the original prevalence work, and every multispecialty guideline since has required a second, confirmatory block before the diagnosis is made or a radiofrequency procedure is offered. Two concordant blocks with recorded durations are the closest thing this field has to an objective finding, and they are what we produce.

How are pain records released to Illinois counsel?

This office is in St. Louis. Dr. Padda is licensed in Illinois and Missouri, holds full privileges at Anderson Hospital in Maryville, and treats a substantial Illinois population from Edwardsville, Belleville, Alton and the towns between. Records are released on a HIPAA-compliant authorization signed by the client, produced in full with imaging on request, and accompanied by a records custodian certification when counsel asks for one. Whether a Missouri record is admissible in an Illinois forum is your question; producing it promptly and completely is ours.

Office procedures are performed at 4499 Woodson Rd. Procedures that need an operating room or a hospital setting, stimulator and pump implants among them, can be done at Anderson Hospital on the Illinois side under his privileges there, which matters when venue and treating-provider location are in play. The first visit is always at the office.

What the block adds to a case

A DIAGNOSIS WITH A NUMBER ATTACHED

A concordant pair of medial branch blocks yields a percentage of relief and a duration, recorded by the client, on two separate days. That is a finding an expert can defend, and it is why the multispecialty consensus on lumbar facet interventions and the ASIPP guidelines both anchor the diagnosis to it.

A NEGATIVE THAT IS ALSO EVIDENCE

A block that does nothing rules that structure out and points the examination elsewhere. Recorded honestly, a negative block strengthens a record rather than weakening it, because it shows the diagnosis was tested and not assumed.

A TREATMENT WHOSE RESULT CAN BE MEASURED

Where blocks confirm the joint, radiofrequency ablation follows, and the original validity study of lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy showed relief measured in many months in properly selected patients. The follow-up notes record function, not only a pain score.

What we will not write

  • A diagnosis we cannot reproduce with an examination or a block.
  • A causation opinion that goes beyond what the mechanism, the timeline and the findings support.
  • A work restriction we did not measure, or a work capacity we did not test.
  • An escalation of medication to fit a narrative. Opioid stewardship here is harm reduction, and it runs on interventional care and behavioral treatment delivered in-house, not on dose.
  • A promise about a claim, a payment or an outcome, to the client or to counsel.

Dr. Padda has lectured on medicolegal issues and third-party payers for the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians and holds certification in coding and compliance. That background shows in the record as precision, not as a stack of disclaimers.

Letters of protection and timing

We consider treatment under a letter of protection case by case, and accepting one changes nothing about what gets documented. Timing matters more than most counsel expect: the earlier the measured baseline, the less the record depends on memory, and the earlier a block is done, the cleaner the line from mechanism to diagnosis. The general two-year Illinois limitations period for personal injury is your clock; ours is the sensitization that begins in the first weeks after an injury and makes late records harder to read.

Testimony and availability

Dr. Padda is available for deposition testimony regarding his own patients, scheduled through the office. He treats the metabolic terrain alongside the spine, which means a record from this practice often contains bloodwork, and that bloodwork is sometimes the explanation for why one client healed and another did not. Expect it to be in the file, and expect him to explain it.

When the record includes PRP or another orthobiologic

Some injury cases here include platelet-rich plasma or another orthobiologic, and defense experts have a standard move against them: the payer’s vocabulary. The record is written to preempt it. Each orthobiologic entry names the structure treated, the imaging and examination findings that tie it to the incident, and the published guideline tier for that specific body part: the European and American society statements and the randomized-trial meta-analyses for the knee, the trial evidence for the elbow, and the 2025 ASIPP practice guideline with its graded levels for the spine. The negative studies are named too, because a record that cites only the favorable literature is easy to impeach; the rotator cuff data, for instance, do not support PRP and a shoulder here is not injected with it.

Coverage is documented as what it is. Most commercial plans and Medicare do not pay for PRP, and the note says so in those words, as a funding decision by the plan, without adopting the plan’s adjectives. Costs are recorded as medical expenses the injury made necessary; we do not publish prices and we do not write opinions on how a claim should treat them. If you need the guideline documents themselves for an exhibit, ask; they are public and we will cite the exact editions used.

Frequently asked questions

Do you treat clients under a letter of protection?

Case by case, and it has no effect on what is documented; the way to ask is to contact the office with the client’s circumstances before the first visit is booked.

How soon can a Metro East client be seen?

Call for the next consultation opening; the first visit is diagnostic and nothing is injected on the day, as described in what to expect.

What does a diagnostic block add to a personal injury case?

A reproducible finding with a recorded percentage and duration of relief on two separate days, which is explained for clients in what a diagnostic block tells you.

Will Dr. Padda give deposition testimony?

On his own patients, scheduled through the office, and his credentials and background are set out on the about page.

Do you take Illinois workers’ compensation cases?

Injured Illinois workers are seen here under the choice-of-physician provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act, and what we document for the Commission is on the injured at work page.

How are crash injuries documented differently?

Mechanism, timeline and measured findings are recorded as if a hostile reader will see them, which the car accident page describes for clients.

How do you get a doctor to take pain seriously after an injury?

Ask for measurements, not descriptions. A record that holds up lists range of motion in degrees, graded strength and reflexes, mapped sensation and named provocation tests, with imaging read against that examination. When the pain comes from a facet or sacroiliac joint, two controlled diagnostic blocks on separate days put a recorded percentage and duration of relief in the file. That is pain written down as a finding.

Can an MRI show what is causing pain after an accident?

Rarely on its own. A systematic review of spinal imaging in adults without pain found disc degeneration in most people by their fifties and bulges in a majority, so an MRI report says little about causation and less about which structure hurts. Facet and sacroiliac joint pain do not show on any scan; controlled diagnostic blocks are the test for those.

Does a negative diagnostic block hurt an injury case?

No. A block that does nothing rules that structure out and points the examination elsewhere. Recorded honestly, a negative block strengthens the record, because it shows the diagnosis was tested rather than assumed. It is also why a record from this practice never contains a diagnosis we could not reproduce with an examination or a block.

Related reading

You will get a record built from measurements, produced when you ask for it

Send the client’s authorization and the crash or incident report and we will tell you what we can see and how quickly. What we find is what we write, and the record will say so.

505 Buckeye Dr, Suite 200
Troy, IL 62294
Procedure clinic: 4499 Woodson Rd, St. Louis, MO 63134, off I-70 next to St. Louis Lambert International Airport. One bridge from the Metro East.

Sources

  • Schwarzer AC et al. The false-positive rate of uncontrolled diagnostic blocks of the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Pain, 1994. PubMed 7816487
  • Brinjikji W et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2015. PubMed 25430861
  • Lord SM et al. Chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash. A placebo-controlled prevalence study. Spine, 1996. PubMed 8855458
  • Cohen SP et al. Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 2020. PubMed 32245841
  • Dreyfuss P et al. Efficacy and validity of radiofrequency neurotomy for chronic lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. Spine, 2000. PubMed 10806505
  • Kon E et al. Platelet-rich plasma injections for the management of knee osteoarthritis: the ESSKA-ICRS consensus. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2024. PubMed 38961773
  • Manchikanti L et al. Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines for Regenerative Therapies in the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain: 2025 Update from the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians. Pain Physician, 2025. PubMed 41481869
  • Feltri P et al. Platelet-rich plasma does not improve clinical results in patients with rotator cuff disorders. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023. PubMed 36496450